Review of Google Drive/Docs
Google Drive/Docs
Reviewed 19 Sep 2011
·
Average score 66%
Summary
Users with eyesight problems will have trouble using this web 2.0 service. It does not react well to be enlarged and is not 100% usable with a screen reader. Signing up to the service will be difficult as the login form captcha is not very accessible for the visually impaired.
Detailed Results
# | Test | Outcome | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | 33% | Same as before. |
2 | Image ALT Attributes | 100% | Same as before. |
3 | Link Target Definitions | 100% | Same as before. |
4 | Frame Titles and Layout | 100% | Same as before. |
5 | Removal of Stylesheet | 33% | Same as before. |
6 | Audio/Video Features | 67% | Same as before. |
7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | 67% | Same as before. |
8 | Appropriate use of Tables | 33% | Same as before. |
9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | 67% | Same as before. |
10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | 67% | Same as before. |
11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | 67% | The the text editor gives tools in some instances and not other. There are extensive tools within the document creator, but a lot less in other aspects of Google docs. |
12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | 67% | Same as before. |
13 | Contrast and Colour Check | 100% | Same as before. |
14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | 33% | Same as before. |
15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | 67% | Same as before. |