Review of Ning

Ning Reviewed 15 Jul 2014 · Average score 71%



Detailed Results

# Test Outcome Notes
1 Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible 0% Keyboard access/tabbing works logically, No CAPTCHA was found. Form controls/fields appear to have corresponding labels (WAVE), but could be read using NVDA. However, within the search engine itself the main input field is not labelled which is the whole
2 Image ALT Attributes 0% Images have either non-defined alternative text or none at all.
3 Link Target Definitions 67% There are some duplicated and not self-explanatory links on the website.
4 Frame Titles and Layout 100% No frames found within website layout.
5 Removal of Stylesheet 67% The website content is accessible, but not structured.
6 Audio/Video Features 67% Text description and audio tracks are available, but not the caption or transcripts.
7 Video/animations - audio descriptions 67% Text description and audio tracks are available, but not the caption or transcripts.
8 Appropriate use of Tables 100% Page layout does not use tables and/or headered tables are used to present data.
9 Tab Orderings Correct and Logical 33% Tabbing order is correct, but no highlighting is provided.
10 Page Functionality with Keyboard 67% Nearly all parts of the website are available via keyboard.
11 Accessibility of Text Editors 100% No rich text editors are ound on the website.
12 Appropriate Feedback with Forms 100% Clear, appropriate feedback is provided next to the form controls. No time constraints.
13 Contrast and Colour Check 100% Site contrast is acceptable.
14 Page Integrity when Zooming 100% Readability unaffected when zooming and the layout is responsive to changes.
15 Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability 100% Text is generally 12pt, sans serif font. There is no flashing or blinking content.