Review of Ning
Ning
Reviewed 15 Jul 2014
·
Average score 71%
Summary
TBC
Detailed Results
| # | Test | Outcome | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible | 0% | Keyboard access/tabbing works logically, No CAPTCHA was found. Form controls/fields appear to have corresponding labels (WAVE), but could be read using NVDA. However, within the search engine itself the main input field is not labelled which is the whole |
| 2 | Image ALT Attributes | 0% | Images have either non-defined alternative text or none at all. |
| 3 | Link Target Definitions | 67% | There are some duplicated and not self-explanatory links on the website. |
| 4 | Frame Titles and Layout | 100% | No frames found within website layout. |
| 5 | Removal of Stylesheet | 67% | The website content is accessible, but not structured. |
| 6 | Audio/Video Features | 67% | Text description and audio tracks are available, but not the caption or transcripts. |
| 7 | Video/animations - audio descriptions | 67% | Text description and audio tracks are available, but not the caption or transcripts. |
| 8 | Appropriate use of Tables | 100% | Page layout does not use tables and/or headered tables are used to present data. |
| 9 | Tab Orderings Correct and Logical | 33% | Tabbing order is correct, but no highlighting is provided. |
| 10 | Page Functionality with Keyboard | 67% | Nearly all parts of the website are available via keyboard. |
| 11 | Accessibility of Text Editors | 100% | No rich text editors are ound on the website. |
| 12 | Appropriate Feedback with Forms | 100% | Clear, appropriate feedback is provided next to the form controls. No time constraints. |
| 13 | Contrast and Colour Check | 100% | Site contrast is acceptable. |
| 14 | Page Integrity when Zooming | 100% | Readability unaffected when zooming and the layout is responsive to changes. |
| 15 | Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability | 100% | Text is generally 12pt, sans serif font. There is no flashing or blinking content. |