Review of Lino · Web2Access

Summary

This site really has to be enjoyed with the use of the mouse, dragging and dropping, reshaping and changing. It is possible to read the results in a text browser but it is not ideal for this type of dynamic content. Take away the style sheets etc and really the site is unusable but it is a highly visual and tactile type of interaction with ideas which can help memory skills.

Detailed Results

#	Test	Outcome	Notes
1	Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible	33%	No form labels which may make it hard for a screenreader user to know what the forms require. There is no captcha system, which avoids some accessibility problems.
2	Image ALT Attributes	67%	Some images lack alt tags but the main ones used as links to different parts of the service work well.
3	Link Target Definitions	67%	Most links are uniquely identified so can be understood by a screenreader.
4	Frame Titles and Layout	100%	No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5	Removal of Stylesheet	0%	The site is unusable without the stylesheet.
6	Audio/Video Features	100%	N/A - This site does not deal with multimedia content.
7	Video/animations - audio descriptions	0%	The service is designed to allow users to add sticky notes to a desktop and it is not possible to add audio descriptions.
8	Appropriate use of Tables	33%	Some tables are used within the site, but do not have headings.
9	Tab Orderings Correct and Logical	100%	Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10	Page Functionality with Keyboard	0%	Critical functinoality of this site requires the use of a pointing device.
11	Accessibility of Text Editors	0%	Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12	Appropriate Feedback with Forms	100%	The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13	Contrast and Colour Check	67%	Some menu text fails validation due to blue-on-blue. Overall contrast largely depends upon background and item colours set by the user.
14	Page Integrity when Zooming	100%	Zooms surprisingly well.
15	Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability	67%	The majority of text on the site is size ten, which is readable but may be uncomfortable for some. Sans-serif fonts are used, and there is no flashing or blinking content.