Review of Mindomo

Mindomo Reviewed 10 Aug 2009 · Average score 51%

Summary

These mindmaps are better edited and created with a mouse although it is possible to add links with the tab key and navigate using arrow keys once you are inside the Flash editor. When you are working with a map it feels very much like a software program with similar menus etc. Even the menus have a Windows Vista look and feel but the editor is not screen reader friendly all you get are the advertisements in text only mode and if you decide to use zoom whilst working in edit mode the adverts take over the mindmap it is best to design items larger within the map!

Detailed Results

# Test Outcome Notes
1 Login, Signup and Other Forms Accessible 0% There are no labels for forms within this product - this may create problems with some screenreaders.
2 Image ALT Attributes 0% Alternative text for images is missing so the graphics are no help for screen reader users.
3 Link Target Definitions 100% All links, including images have descriptive text although some of it is rather long.
4 Frame Titles and Layout 100% No frames or iframes, which can be disorientating for screen-readers, are used in the design.
5 Removal of Stylesheet 0% The site is unusable without the stylesheet.
6 Audio/Video Features 33% The site is for developing mindmaps - it is possible to add videos from You Tube and audio files and then add a text description but if it is too long it affects the mindmap.
7 Video/animations - audio descriptions 33% The site is for developing mindmaps - it is possible to add audio files as audio descriptions and then add a text description but if it is too long it affects the mindmap.
8 Appropriate use of Tables 100% Tables are not used for the design of this website.
9 Tab Orderings Correct and Logical 100% Tab order is in a logical and consistent top-to-bottom or left-to-right format.
10 Page Functionality with Keyboard 0% Due to the use of Flash components, navigation of this site requires a pointing device.
11 Accessibility of Text Editors 0% Text editor is not accessible with the screenreader or keyboard.
12 Appropriate Feedback with Forms 100% The product provides suitable feedback when the user performs an action.
13 Contrast and Colour Check 67% Minor contrast issues on menu groups, hardly critical though.
14 Page Integrity when Zooming 100% The website maintains the layout and usability of all critical areas perfectly when zoomed.
15 Text size, style, blinking elements and Readability 33% Particularly small text prevalent throughout the site, which may be difficult to view without zooming the page.